Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:39

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Apple's Latest Movie Trailer Innovation Suggests The Future Of Premium Home Viewing - SlashFilm
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
What is Alan Kay’s view on analytic idealism by Bernardo Kastrup?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Walking This Many Steps Per Day Can Cut Your Risk Of Early Death - HuffPost
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Which genre of novels is most profitable to publish and why?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
When was the first time your wife had beastiality?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Scientists are experimenting with a completely new approach to combat human aging - Earth.com